For Full-Text PDF, please login, if you are a member of IEICE,|
or go to Pay Per View on menu list, if you are a nonmember of IEICE.
A Hardware Accelerator for JavaTM Platforms on a 130-nm Embedded Processor Core
Tetsuya YAMADA Naohiko IRIE Takanobu TSUNODA Takahiro IRITA Kenji KITAGAWA Ryohei YOSHIDA Keisuke TOYAMA Motoaki SATOYAMA
IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics
Publication Date: 2007/02/01
Online ISSN: 1745-1353
Print ISSN: 0916-8516
Type of Manuscript: PAPER
Category: Integrated Electronics
embedded processor, Java, accelerator, bytecode,
Full Text: PDF(1.8MB)>>
We have developed a hardware accelerator for Java platforms, integrated on a SuperH microprocessor core, using a 130-nm CMOS process. The Java accelerator, a bytecode translation unit (BTU), is tightly coupled with the CPU to share resources. The BTU supports 159 basic bytecodes and 5 or 6 optional bytecodes. It supports both connected device configuration (CDC) 1.0 and connected limited device configuration (CLDC) 1.0.4 technologies. The BTU corresponds to the dual-issued superscalar CPU and applies a new method, control-sharing. With this method, the BTU always grasps the pipeline status of the CPU, and the Java program is processed by both the BTU and the CPU. To implement this method, we developed some acceleration techniques: fast branch requests, enhanced CPU instructions, Java runtime exception detection hardware, and fewer overhead cycles of handover between the BTU and the CPU. In particular, the BTU can detect Java runtime exceptions in parallel with other processing, such as an array access. With previous methods, there is a disadvantage in that CPU efficiency decreases for Java-specific processing, such as array index bounds checking. The sample chip was fabricated in Renesas 130-nm, five-layer Cu, dual-vth low-power CMOS technology. The chip runs at 216 MHz and 1.2 V. The BTU has 75 kG. The benchmark on an evaluation board showed 6.55 embedded caffeine marks (ECM)/MHz on the CLDC 1.0.4 configuration, a tenfold speed increase without the BTU for roughly the same power consumption. In other words, power savings of 90 percent with the same performance were achieved.